DIN ISO 11529-1-2004 铣刀.名称.第1部分:实心或尖头形柄式或端铣刀
时间:2024-05-17 07:43:23 来源: 标准资料网 作者：标准资料网 阅读：9344
【英文标准名称】:Millingcutters-Designation-Part1:Shanktypeendmillsofsolidortippeddesign(ISO11529-1:1998)
【原文标准名称】:铣刀.名称.第1部分:实心或尖头形柄式或端铣刀
【标准号】:DINISO11529-1-2004
【标准状态】:作废
【国别】:德国
【发布日期】:2004-01
【实施或试行日期】:
【发布单位】:德国标准化学会(DIN)
【起草单位】:
【标准类型】:()
【标准水平】:()
【中文主题词】:铣床;名称与符号;图形符号;铣刀;定义;镶齿;硬质合金刀具;端铣刀;工具;切削工具
【英文主题词】:Carbidetools;Cuttingtools;Definition;Definitions;Designations;Endmills;Graphicsymbols;Inserts(cuttingtools);Millingcutters;Millingmachines;Tools
【摘要】:Theprojectestablishesadesignationsystemforshanktypeendmillsofsolidortippeddesignwithamaximumdiameterof99,9mm,withthepurposeofsimplifyingcommunicationbetweenusersandsuppliersofsuchtools.
【中国标准分类号】:J41
【国际标准分类号】:25_100_20
【页数】:10P;A4
【正文语种】:德语
【英文标准名称】:Unboundandhydraulicallyboundmixtures-Part42:testmethodforthedeterminationoftheindirecttensilestrengthofhydraulicallyboundmixtures.
【原文标准名称】:松散的和液力粘合的混合料.第42部分:测定液力粘合混合料的非直接拉伸强度的试验方法
【标准号】:NFP98-846-42-2003
【标准状态】:现行
【国别】:法国
【发布日期】:2003-09-01
【实施或试行日期】:2003-09-05
【发布单位】:法国标准化协会(FR-AFNOR)
【起草单位】:
【标准类型】:()
【标准水平】:()
【中文主题词】:试样;试样;施工材料;规范(验收);试验条件;抽样方法;抗拉试验;间接的;混合物;抗拉强度;团料;粒度分选;含量测定;路面(道路);建筑材料;密度测定法;粘合;测定;定义;样品分割;建材混合料;密度;矿质集料;粒状材料;松散的;公路建设;试验;实验室试验;液压的;试样制备;岩石;建筑
【英文主题词】:Bound;Buildingmaterialmixtures;Buildingmaterials;Conglomerates;Construction;Constructionmaterials;Definition;Definitions;Densimetry;Density;Determination;Determinationofcontent;Grainsizing;Hydraulic;Indirect;Laboratorytesting;Mineralaggregates;Mixtures;Particulatematerials;Pavements(roads);Roadconstruction;Rocks;Sampledivision;Samples;Samplingmethods;Specification(approval);Specimenpreparation;Tensilestrength;Tensiletesting;Testspecimens;Testing;Testingconditions;Unbound
【摘要】:
【中国标准分类号】:Q27
【国际标准分类号】:93_080_20
【页数】:10P.;A4
【正文语种】:其他
MIL-DTL-38219D, DETAIL SPECIFICATION: TURBINE FUEL, LOW VOLATILITY, JP-7 (21 AUG 1998) [SUPERSEDING MIL-PRF-38218C]., This specification covers one grade of aviation turbine fuel designated as JP-7. This specification was thoroughly reviewed as a part of acquisition reform. While most of the requirements were converted to performance terms, due to the military-unique nature of the product and the need for compatibility with deployed systems, it was determined that not all requirements could be converted. The issuance of this specification as "detail" is not intended to constrain technology advances in future systems.